Indeed, the changes have had effects on the scores of some. For example, the addition of Wikipedia boosted Barack Obama's score from 94 to 99, but it had the opposite effect for Justin Bieber, dropping the teen idol's score from 100 to 92. Klout says the difference here is that Klout measures Obama's Wikipedia page as more important and influential than Bieber's.

While I have no Wikipedia page of my own, my Klout score jumped from 59 to 68 with this update. , which describes the changes to the scoring system, I am going to venture a guess that the new actions measured on Facebook and Twitter helped me out. Guess "real-world influence" isn't helping me just yet.

There's another feature coming in "the next few weeks," and that's something Klout is calling "Moments." The goal is this: instead of guessing what content is influencing the most people, this feature will help you spot patterns and "help you shape your influence and improve the quality of your ideas."

I think this will probably make it easier for you to see how to increase your Klout score -- and perhaps play the system even better. At the same time, it adds some much needed transparency to a service many of us have, as yet, are not sure is needed..