In an e-mail sent to Computerworld and posted at the site's recently launched , Plamondon called third-party developers "key industry influencers" who are "critical" to an IT company's success.

"Therefore, describing key industry influencers as 'pawns' is both offensive and inaccurate," Plamondon wrote. "It mischaracterizes the mutually supportive relationship that must exist between a platform vendor and its platforms' early adopters, such as that which Microsoft and independent software developers created in the 1990s. I regret having used the 'pawns' metaphor; I apologize for any misplaced ill will it may have caused towards Microsoft; and I won't use it in [the] future."

In addition to the pawns comparison -- a reference that became public last week in testimony at the Comes v. Microsoft antitrust trial in Iowa -- Plamondon also compared wooing developers to a "one-night stand."

Plamondon is a former Silicon Valley-based Mac software developer who joined Microsoft's Developer Relations Group in 1992 and served as one of its chief technical evangelists for eight years before leaving. Plamondon now lives in western Australia, consults for some local high-tech companies and is working on a book "about the theory and practice of technical evangelism," according to his Web site. He also spelled out his views on independent software vendors in comments posted last May on Parallax.

The comments in his January 1996 speech to other Microsoft technical evangelists was cited by Ronald Alepin, an expert witness for the plaintiffs, as an example of Microsoft's mistreatment of independent software vendors. Microsoft's withholding of key application programming interfaces in the late 1980s to then-competitor Lotus Development Corp. was presented as further evidence of the same thing.