Google+, Day 5: The "Real Names" Debate

07.08.2011
Google ruffled feathers when it simply of Google+ accounts citing a policy that you must use your real name for . Google since on how aggressive it is with enforcement, but the policy itself sparked an online debate about the virtues of pseudonyms and the value of using your real name.

What's In a Name?

It basically comes down to this-- in place that is designed to cut down on the possibility of social network spam and phishing attacks by ensuring that everyone on Google+ is transparent, and really is who they say they are. The policy states, "Google Profiles is a product that works best in the identified state. This way you can be certain you're connecting with the right person, and others will have confidence knowing that there is someone real behind the profile they're checking out."

Opponents argue that banning the use of pseudonyms changes the social networking dynamic, or that dissidents in some nations could place themselves in danger by using their real name, and they need an outlet for sharing information without risking their lives. If you break the Google policy down, though, it doesn't really seem to enforce the use of a "real" name.

Define "Real Name"

Why? Well, there is never any valid authentication or validation of my identity when I set up a Google profile. I can set up a Gmail account without any proof at all of my identity. The closes it comes to verifying who I am is that it requires either a verification code via text message or voice call. I chose text message, and Google could ostensibly associate my Google profile with the identity tied to that mobile phone number--but it is also possible that I asked to borrow a stranger's mobile phone for a minute just to receive the verification text. Google doesn't know one way or the other.