Filed in the United States District Court Western District of Arkansas, Luxpro says in the lawsuit that "Apple has sought to stamp out the competition using various schemes" and "has repeatedly used unfair tactics against other smaller manufacturers."

In 2005 Luxpro in Germany. The "Super Shuffle" was a bit too much like Apple's iPod shuffle and Apple applied for and won injunctive relief from a German court. Luxpro later the product under the Super Tangent name.

"Apple, as part of its scheme to squash a competitor, then sued Luxpro in Taiwan alleging that the appearance of the Super Tangent, EZ Tangent, and Top Tangent closely resembled the iPod shuffle," the lawsuit reads. "Through a clearly one-sided submission by Apple when the lawsuit was filed, Apple was able to convince a Taiwanese court to enter a preliminary injunction that prohibited Luxpro from manufacturing, distributing and marketing any of its MP3 products."

Even though Luxpro won the case on appeal, the company claims that "Apple's unlawful legal strategy caused Luxpro to lose valuable market opportunities and a considerable amount of product orders."

Luxpro also claims that Apple applied pressure to its business partners demanding they stop doing business with Luxpro.