RFC 6593, titled "," was submitted by three co-authors from .

ARCHIVES:

HA HA:

The abstract reads: "With the ubiquitous success of service discovery techniques, curious clients are faced with an increasing overload of service instances and options listed when they browse for services. A typical domain may contain web servers, remote desktop servers, printers, file servers, video content servers, automatons, Points of Presence using artificial intelligence, etc., all advertising their presence. Unsurprisingly, it is expected that some protocols and services will choose the comfort of anonymity and avoid discovery. This memo describes a new experimental protocol for this purpose utilizing the Domain Pseudonym System (DPS), and discusses strategies for its successful implementation and deployment."

As you dive deeper into the RFC, the authors weave in various Hide-and-Go-Seek references such as counting and identifying a client as being "it." Other jokey references include the Silence-as-a-Service method of keeping hidden and the various levels of finding it, ranging from "absolute zero" to "warm" to "burning-up."