The next round in this likely long process has just started. Apple, AT&T and Google have sent the FCC answers to its questions. If you just read the first two of these responses you would get images: an Apple that has strong ideas on what is Right and is buried in poorly written applications, and a timorous AT&T afraid of the fragility of its network and of its business. Reading the third one paints a picture of Google as a kid not wanting to share its report card with adults.

The letters do make it clear that some of the conspiracy theories being bandied about on the Internet over the last few weeks that had AT&T telling a subservient Apple to block Google Voice were off the mark -- at least in this case. Both the and the say that AT&T was not involved in Apple's review of the Google Voice application.The two letters also say that AT&T has provided Apple with some rules about what kind of applications cannot be approved. For example, AT&T wants to block some types of applications that use the AT&T cellular network, including voice over IP (VoIP) applications, and applications that use a lot of bandwidth, such as TV redirectors. Note that neither of these apply to Google Voice.

AT&T cries poverty about these applications -- poverty of network resources for the high-bandwidth applications and poverty of business model for the VoIP applications. I guess AT&T does not think it can get by just selling you data connectivity; it also needs to rip you off for minutes of voice airtime and SMS messages in order to get by.

Apple said that it spends a lot of time being a nanny to the App Store -- testing and rejecting buggy or naughty applications. Apparently, Apple thinks it will reflect poorly on the company if you download an application written by some amateur programmer and it crashes.